Good idea. Of course I should be sure to get it "authenticated" after I have it properly recreated (I mean, *"restored"*).
But then I would no longer have 872 title cards and scene cards in this week's offerings of lobby cards (I would have 871) and all the advertising I have done to this point would be mis-representation, and I would likely be hit with several lawsuits from collectors feeling I had deceived them. What to do, what to do? I would say the best thing any collector or dealer could do would be to go to the entire auction gallery at * http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/13.html*<http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/13.html> and see these great (and now controversial) lobby cards for themselves! Bruce Hershenson (and the 22 other members of the eMoviePoster.com team) P.O. Box 874 West Plains, MO 65775 Phone: 417-256-9616 (hours: Mon-Fri 9 to 5 except from 12 to 1 when we take lunch) website: http://www.emovieposter.com e-mail: m...@emovieposter.com our auctions: http://auctions.emovieposter.com On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Roger Kim <roger...@iname.com> wrote: > Bruce, > I am honored and deeply touched that I could play a small part in this > week's emovieposter.com publicity campaign. > > As a practical joke and/or biting postmodern commentary on the current > state of poster collecting, I suggest that you pull the Tarzan lobby card > from this week's auction, have a restorer "fix" the misplaced apostrophe, > then re-list the card in next week's auctions. > > Sincerely, > Roger > > > On Sep 29, 2009, at 7:58 PM, Bruce Hershenson wrote: > > For a second there, when I saw the URL of the auction you linked to, I > thought you meant that *WE* had made one of our ultra-rare typos, and my > blood froze. After all, the 872 title cards and scene cards are one of the > very best offerings of lobby cards we have ever had (and around half are *both > high grade AND completely unrestored*), and I was saddened to think they > had been marred by a silly typo. > > It wasn't until I clicked on the auction itself (rather than use your link, > I instead went to the entire auction gallery at * > http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/13.html*<http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/13.html> > and > I found the item, and lo and behold, it was the printer who made the error! > > Please be more careful how you point out such errors in the future. My > heart can only take so much excitement! > > Bruce Hershenson (and the 22 other members of the eMoviePoster.com team) > P.O. Box 874 > West Plains, MO 65775 > Phone: 417-256-9616 (hours: Mon-Fri 9 to 5 except from 12 to 1 when we take > lunch) > website: http://www.emovieposter.com e-mail: m...@emovieposter.com > our auctions: http://auctions.emovieposter.com > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Roger Kim <roger...@iname.com> wrote: > >> Speaking of typos, this LC says: >> >> "Edgar Rice Burrough's Tarzan and the Leopard Woman" >> >> http://www.emovieposter.com/gallery/inc/large_size.php?lot=7r756 >> >> His name is Burroughs, not Burrough. Nice card, though. >> >> -rk >> >> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com >> ___________________________________________________________________ >> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List >> Send a message addressed to: >> lists...@listserv.american.edu >> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L >> The author of this message is solely >> responsible for its content. >> > > Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com > ___________________________________________________________________ How to > UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: > lists...@listserv.american.edu In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF > MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content. > > > Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com ___________________________________________________________________ How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
