Saw it in 3-D a few weeks ago.  Brilliant.  It's too bad so many  people 
think it's a "kids movie" when it's not.
I agree that a lot must be lost in viewing it in 2-D  rather than 3-D...
                                                                         
Rick
 
 
In a message dated 1/21/2012 9:34:58 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
ki...@movieart.net writes:

Finally  I saw this Christmas release.

I  was a little underwhelmed in some  respects and quite overwhelmed in 
others.
It's a 3D film that must be seen  in 3D.  Scorsese uses 3D in an 
intelligent way to
try to capture some  of the magic at the birth of cinema.  The art 
direction, set decoration,  photography,
movement, blocking, staging, and
production values are at  once grand and astonishing.  It's worth seeing 
for that alone.

As  a kids' film, it is a little too grown-up, I think.  For age 10 and  
above.
Not that there is anything objectionable in it; I just wonder if it  can
hold the attention of a young kid.  It is not short.  In  fact, it may be a 
little
too long for someone who is not absolutely  enthralled with the subject, but
that would not include me.

The  movie is Professor Scorsese's ticket to impart his rapturous love
of early  cinema.  He tries, with remarkable success, to dramatize the  
mechanical world of the early 20th century using 3D to make it all  come
alive and to lionize the tinkerers, chemists, cameramen and directors  who 
literally invented
moving pictures.  

As a testament to  Scorsese's abilities as a director especially his power
to harness vision  within an enormous production, the film is impressive.

Seeing this  movie on TV in 2D will be almost like missing it.
It's a movie-lovers movie  and it is large.

How was I perhaps a little underwhelmed?  The  Cinema is
the star of this movie.  This is not a star-turn  picture.  The acting is 
good,
but Scorsese never lets these actors,  with the exception of Sacha 
Baron-Cohen, whom
he doesn't seem able to  control entirely,
get anywhere near stealing this picture.  In this  sense, the film is the 
polar opposite
of a movie like TREE OF LIFE where  the actors are unleashed to carry the 
film or
MONEYBALL which is old  fashioned Brad Pitt movie star stuff cooked to  
perfection.

K.

Visit the MoPo  Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo  Mailing List

Send a message addressed to:  lists...@listserv.american.edu
In  the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely  responsible for its content.


         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to