I loved it!


________________________________
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sat, January 21, 2012 10:12:56 AM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] RECOMMENDED: HUGO

Saw it in 3-D a few weeks ago.  Brilliant.  It's too bad so many  people think 
it's a "kids movie" when it's not.
I agree thata lot must be lost in viewing it in 2-D  rather than 3-D...
                                                                         Rick
 
In a message dated 1/21/2012 9:34:58 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
[email protected] writes:
Finally    I saw this Christmas release.
>
>I  was a little underwhelmed in some    respects and quite overwhelmed in 
>others.
>It's a 3D film that must be seen    in 3D.  Scorsese uses 3D in an intelligent 
>way to
>try to capture some    of the magic at the birth of cinema.  The art 
>direction, 
>set decoration,    photography,
>movement, blocking, staging, and
>production values are at    once grand and astonishing.  It's worth seeing for 
>that alone.
>
>As    a kids' film, it is a little too grown-up, I think.  For age 10 and    
>above.
>Not that there is anything objectionable in it; I just wonder if it    can
>hold the attention of a young kid.  It is not short.  In    fact, it may be a 
>little
>too long for someone who is not absolutely    enthralled with the subject, but
>that would not include me.
>
>The    movie is Professor Scorsese's ticket to impart his rapturous love
>of early    cinema.  He tries, with remarkable success, to dramatize the 
>mechanical world of the early 20th century using 3D to make it all    come
>alive and to lionize the tinkerers, chemists, cameramen and directors    who 
>literally invented
>moving pictures.  
>
>As a testament to    Scorsese's abilities as a director especially his power
>to harness vision    within an enormous production, the film is impressive.
>
>Seeing this    movie on TV in 2D will be almost like missing it.
>It's a movie-lovers movie    and it is large.
>
>How was I perhaps a little underwhelmed?  The    Cinema is
>the star of this movie.  This is not a star-turn    picture.  The acting is 
>good,
>but Scorsese never lets these actors,    with the exception of Sacha 
>Baron-Cohen, whom
>he doesn't seem able to    control entirely,
>get anywhere near stealing this picture.  In this    sense, the film is the 
>polar opposite
>of a movie like TREE OF LIFE where    the actors are unleashed to carry the 
>film 
>or
>MONEYBALL which is old    fashioned Brad Pitt movie star stuff cooked to    
>perfection.
>
>K.
>
>         Visit the MoPo    Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>      ___________________________________________________________________
>                 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo    Mailing List
>                                       
>          Send a message addressed to:    [email protected]
>            In    the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>                                          
>    The author of this message is solely    responsible for its content.
> 
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to