That looks great Matt and your photographic setup must be top notch.

Do you have details of the vacuum board that you use? I have wondering about 
getting hold of one.

Adam.

On 29 Mar 2023, at 18:04, Matt Johnston <drharryc...@gmail.com> wrote:

 For color reference… This is an unused example I bought from Alan Alder many 
many years ago. He said it had only been unfolded once for his picture. I 
unfolded it a 2nd time for these photos and it’s been in a flat file since.  My 
photo setup was designed to get a true and honest representation of color, 
detail and condition — no added sharpening and absolutely no added color 
saturation. Yuck. This was shot on a vacuum board with color steady strobes and 
color corrected, honestly, to the best of my ability so that I end up with good 
consistency between various batched of pictures. I guess it’s possible 
uploading to imgur for hosting (where they probably recompressing it) could 
slightly affect color representation. And of course the screen you are viewing 
it on might not be color correction, etc., etc...

That all said, this is probably as close as you’ll come to a “reference" 
example.

Apologies if the pics don’t embed… I never was quite sure how to do that here.

https://i.imgur.com/hH4ni3N.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/aegyhXp.jpg


On Mar 29, 2023, at 12:02 PM, Kirby McDaniel 
<ki...@movieart.com<mailto:ki...@movieart.com>> wrote:

I take your point.  Having said that, sun-faded or something else, I would not 
want this poster, either personally or for inventory, because it's not within 
the range that was intended.  Not for $9000 +, not for $500.

Kirby

On Mar 29, 2023, at 10:32 AM, peter contarino 
<mpexchangeu...@gmail.com<mailto:mpexchangeu...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Kirby look at the blacks on that poster. That thing must have come out of 
Maddalena's Florida room.

On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 11:15 AM Kirby McDaniel 
<ki...@movieart.com<mailto:ki...@movieart.com>> wrote:
Speaking to that: the intent of Saul Bass with regard to designing the one 
sheet for VERTIGO was to specify a background color of a certain "shade", if 
you will, of orange.  I have always called it vermillion.  Yet we have seen, as 
has been pointed out that there are (almost) deep red variants of the poster as 
well as posters that are light orange.  Most are in the range that was 
intended.  It is safe to say that most have had some color shift since the day 
they were printed sixty-five years ago.  So, my question is: is this poster 
sun-faded, or is it merely in the range of "lighter".  Most of the posters that 
I have seen which are significantly sun-faded have some textural degradation of 
the paper itself.

I have heard people lionize a deep red variant for the simple reason that it 
would "work better" with their decor.  I kid you NOT.

K.

Kirby McDaniel
movieart.com<http://movieart.com/>

On Mar 29, 2023, at 5:41 AM, David Kusumoto 
<davidmkusum...@hotmail.com<mailto:davidmkusum...@hotmail.com>> wrote:

Again, just my opinion, not necessarily factual. - d.


________________________________

To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1


________________________________

To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1


________________________________

To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to