Rasheed, and an aside to Platt:
Rasheed:
> Marco said:
>
> 'a) The free market is Victorian. According to all what RMP uses to say about
> Victorians, maybe it could be possible to find something better'
>
> I dont know how the free market is supposedly Victorian, didn't Pirsig
> explain that his take on the Victorian social codes to be very prudish and
> upright? Like Rigel, pretty much. The free market is Dynamic, DQ is
> inseparable from it. Maybe i need some more clarification.
>
Actually, the Market exists since the time of the creation of the social level,
I guess. And Freedom is even more ancient, isn't it? So the idea of a Free
Market must be very old.
It is Pirsig who writes: "It is not that Victorian social economic patterns are
more moral than socialist intellectual economic patterns... ". IMO he just wants
to say that the Victorians are supporters of the market... don't you think that
Mr Richard Rigel could well be a good stock jobber?
> (in my flawless Al pacino voice) Marco, i knew it was you. you broke my
> heart. YOu broke my heart Marco. sorry, i had to do that, im surprised
> no one beat me to it.
Well, take care of your heart. It think you should keep it for Mrs
Riskybiz-Parker (just beware of her father) :-)
Marco
p.s. to Platt:
Do you want to continue the thread? It would be very valuable to me to argue to
what extent intellect should be over society....
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
