Re: MD Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ

[Wim Nusselder]

Dear Stephen,   You wrote 20/6 13:26 +0100 in the "Back on topic"-thread: "In relation to Wim's post I would put it as dynamic quality is a void that can be re-experienced time and again. As human beings we change at different rates and absorb new static patterns at different rates and different static patterns we have 'taken on' (to the previous time) make us think we are seeing something new where infact the dynamic q is the same indefinable its allways been."   I think you referred to my 20/6 11:29 +0200 post in the "Religion/God ~ MoQ/DQ"-thread, so I answer in that thread.   I hesitate to describe DQ as a void. A void, the absence of or freedom from all static patterns of value, may be a prerequisite to (very temporarily) experience DQ but I don't see the Quality, the Good, in a void in itself. Can a void be the ultimate Good (that ever eludes us) towards all static patterns are migrating? It could just as well be the ultimate Evil which they are migrating from. It needs more than a void to explain the change for the better DQ creates. Just breaking up, denying, freeing your'self' from static patterns of value does not account for (re)creation of better static patterns of value.   With friendly greetings,   Wim Nusselder