-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [morphoj/tps format] Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 14:50:42 -0400 From: Chris Klingenberg <[email protected]> Reply-To: [email protected] Organization: University of Manchester To: [email protected] Dear Bachar For 3D data in the TPS format, use "LM3=" instead of "LM=". Here is the corrresponding spec from the help file from tpsSmall (as far as I know, this is the official documentation for 3D data in the TPS series): "For 3D data use the LM3= keyword rather than the LM= keyword and list the x, y, z coordinates of each specimen with one line for each landmark." (The next release of MorphoJ will give a more detailed output in the error message.) If I fix that problem, I get a second error about the number of landmarks. Also, I get errors if I try to open the file with tpsSmall -- perhaps you want to try with an example with fewer than 100 landmarks first. Best wishes, Chris Copyright © 1999 by F. James Rohlf On 10/3/2011 6:15 PM, morphmet wrote:
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: subscribe Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 12:06:52 -0400 From: Bachar Cheaib<[email protected]> To: [email protected] Hi, I am using Morphoj, I tried .txt or .tps , the software figure out these following messages Reading from TPS file 'test_morphoj.tps'. Problems with reading the file. Inconsistent dimensionality in record 1: 2D data although user-defined dimensionality is 3D. The number of dimensions in some entry/entries in record 1 appears to be inconsistent with the number of dimensions. Inconsistent dimensionality in record 2: 2D data although user-defined dimensionality is 3D. The number of dimensions in some entry/entries in record 2 appears to be inconsistent with the number of dimensions. Inconsistent dimensionality in record 3: 2D data although user-defined dimensionality is 3D. The number of dimensions in some entry/entries in record 3 appears to be inconsistent with the number of dimensions. Inconsistent dimensionality in record 4: 2D data although user-defined dimensionality is 3D. The number of dimensions in some entry/entries in record 4 appears to be inconsistent with the number of dimensions. Inconsistent dimensionality in record 5: 2D data although user-defined dimensionality is 3D. The number of dimensions in some entry/entries in record 5 appears to be inconsistent with the number of dimensions. Errors occurred in the reading process. The new dataset could not be created. I have chosen 3D, and format TPS Please, could you be able to help me in finding my input error ? I attached this file input below Thanks in advance All the best regards B. Cheaib
-- *************************************************************** Christian Peter Klingenberg Faculty of Life Sciences The University of Manchester Michael Smith Building Oxford Road Manchester M13 9PT United Kingdom Telephone: +44 161 275 3899 Fax: +44 161 275 5082 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.flywings.org.uk Skype: chris_klingenberg ***************************************************************
