----- Forwarded message from [email protected] -----

Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 16:54:27 -0800
From: [email protected]
Reply-To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: UPGMA: Euclidean and Procrustes distances
To: [email protected]


----- Forwarded message from Carlos Eduardo R D Alencar -----

Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 11:36:40 -0500
From: Carlos Eduardo R D Alencar
Reply-To: Carlos Eduardo R D Alencar
Subject: Re: UPGMA: Euclidean and Procrustes distances
To: [email protected]

Dear Rodrigo,

Good question. That was one of the doubts that I had in mind and were well clarified. My use was to check similarities between groups of crabs in different species and locations.
Well, in a second time you might want to check what the best method of biding grouping (clustering).  I would like to leave a tip, according to analyzes already performed by me (in several aspects) morphological, ecological (communities) and etc. ... UPGMA method was not very well. My assessment is based on two coefficients (
cophenetic correlation coefficient and aglomeration coefficient). Maybe you want to test them before using the UPGMA.

Cheers
Carlos


On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:41 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:



----- Forwarded message from Rodrigo Lima -----

Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:46:37 -0500

From: Rodrigo Lima
Reply-To: Rodrigo Lima
Subject: RE: UPGMA: Euclidean and Procrustes distances
To: "[email protected]"

Dear Andrea, Oyvind, and Philipp,

Thank you very much for your answers, they totally clarified my doubts.

Best wishes,
Rodrigo

From: [email protected] [[email protected]]
Sent: November 18, 2012 1:40 AM
To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: UPGMA: Euclidean and Procrustes distances


----- Forwarded message from Philipp Mitteröcker -----

Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 11:18:49 -0500
From: Philipp Mitteröcker
Reply-To: Philipp Mitteröcker
Subject: Re: UPGMA: Euclidean and Procrustes distances
To: [email protected]

Euclidean distances are equal to Procrustes distances in tangent space, so they are close enough to the original Procrustes distances.

Best,

Philipp 




Am 15.11.2012 um 20:32 schrieb [email protected]:


----- Forwarded message from Rodrigo Lima -----

Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:21:28 -0500
From: Rodrigo Lima 
Reply-To: Rodrigo Lima 
Subject: UPGMA: Euclidean and Procrustes distances
To: "[email protected]" 

Dear morphometricians,

I would greatly appreciate your input on this matter:

The context: I am studying 9 populations of a small rodent species and I wanted to represent morphological relationships between populations using a UPGMA cluster analysis.

The problem:  I used the mean population shapes (Procrustes coordinates) to do this analysis in PAST using Euclidean distances and got a nice tree with bootstrap values, but there is no option for using Procrustes distances in this package. I get the same topology using Procrustes distances with R, but I can’t get the bootstrap values on the nodes of the tree.

The questions:
1 - Are UPGMA analyses using Euclidean distances and Procrustes distances equivalent?
2 - Is there any package in which I could simply enter the Procrustes distances and get a UPGMA tree with bootstrap values?

Thank you in advance,
Rodrigo


----- End forwarded message -----





___________________________________

Dr. Philipp Mitteroecker

Department of Theoretical Biology
University of Vienna
Althanstrasse 14
A-1090 Vienna, Austria

Tel: +43 1 4277 56705
Fax: +43 1 4277 9544
email: [email protected]
homepage: http://theoretical.univie.ac.at/people/mitteroecker



----- End forwarded message -----






----- End forwarded message -----







--
Carlos Eduardo R. D. Alencar
Biólogo, Msc.
[email protected]

Bolsista CAPES - Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia - PPGE
Grupo de Estudos em Ecologia e Fisiologia de Animais Aquáticos - GEEFAA [www.geefaa.com]
Departamento de Botânica, Ecologia e Zoologia - DBEZ
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte - UFRN



----- End forwarded message -----





----- End forwarded message -----



Reply via email to