Dear morphometricians, I have an interesting GMM dataset based on the cranial morphology of adult New World monkeys (platyrrhines) with a wide sampling of genera and species. I have approximately ten male and ten females for each species, and am interested in testing for size and shape dimorphism in each group. My current thinking is to use a Procrustes ANOVA to test for significant differences between males and females for each taxa, and wanted to enquire whether this was the standard approach with geometric morphometric data, or if an alternative approach would be more appropriate? Any advice greatly appreciated, Best wishes Alex Bjarnason
-- MORPHMET may be accessed via its webpage at http://www.morphometrics.org To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
