Hi everybody, I had previously asked a question on this list if my MOSES setup seemed reasonable to anybody. Carlos Henriquez replied, suggesting that I tried tuning, for which thanks!
Now I am trying this tuning process out and have would be much obliged
if somebody could check if I've got the procedure right.
I have split my original training data into training' and dev. I ran
trained moses on training' which resulted in a directory
mydata/model
mydata/model/moses.ini
mydata/model/some_other_important_files
I then ran the tuning script as
cd mydata/model
${MOSES_SCRIPTS}/training/mert-moses.pl\
../dev-source-language\
../dev-target-language\
/usr/local/bin/moses
This gave me
mydata/model/mert-work
mydata/model/mert-work/moses.ini
mydata/model/merk-work/some_other_important_files
I intend to run moses on the test data as follows
cd mydata
moses -f model/mert-work/moses.ini < test-source-language
Does that sound right?
Also, I get this warning
> Use of uninitialized value within @WORD_FACTOR in concatenation (.) or
> string at ${MOSES_SCRIPTS}/training/filter-model-given-input.pl line
> 132, <INPUT> line 1.
Have I done something wrong? I'm using an unfactored model, for what
it's worth. Interestingly, if I run the script a second time, I do not
get this complaint.
Thanks!
--
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Moses-support mailing list Moses-support@mit.edu http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
