On 20.03.2014 13:42, Florian Bruhin wrote: > * Vincent Lefevre <vincent-m...@vinc17.net> [2014-03-20 13:29:33 +0100]:
> > $ tput smacs; echo "mq>" > > └─> ... > Why would you need this anyways, when you can have Unicode? Because many programs still work with the 'secondary charsets' in the old logic of vt100 based terminals. BUT mosh simply does not interfere. IF you have a definition of 'smacs', your tput will simply write the corresponding chars to 'the terminal', and what 'the terminal' will do with them depends on the client side program, not on mosh. The simple way tot test might be doing (on UNIXes): $ echo '^Nmq>^O' (^N and ^O are 'Control...) and you may need to type them as <control-v><control-n> and <control-v><control-o> AND do not forget the ' at both ends. These are the default switching chars for vt100 based terms, and IF this works on a local terminal AND on the same terminal with a mosh-connection therein, the definition of the $TERM at the server side is wrong. IF, which should NOT happen, it really fails in the remote case only, you'll have to find out, what filters the control chars... Stucki _______________________________________________ mosh-users mailing list mosh-users@mit.edu http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/mosh-users
