Sounds reasonable to me. Maybe at some stage when the examples are clear and complete, they can be fused into the documentation.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 7:54 AM, mark richardson <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I hope this isn't going to spark a storm of controversy. > In the past, when I first started using Oz, one of the main problems I had > was with the documentation. Lets say some of it wasn't as clear as it could > be for 'newbies' and there was a lack of clear 'real-world' examples. > I know there's a few examples around if you look hard enough but I still > believe it would be beneficial for new users (and possibly more experienced > ones) to have examples/explanations available directly in the Mozart > documentation; particularly snippets from the user archives to save > searching the archives each time or having similar questions asked > repeatedly. > Let me make it clear that I'm not proposing re-writing the entire > documentation, however I am considering adding google sidewiki comments as I > come across any examples that might be of use or extra explanation that may > be required. > > What I'm wondering is if there is any interest from other users to do > similar? Nothing on a large scale, just small additions would soon build up > into helpful extra information. > > Does anyone else think this would be worthwhile? > > Regards > > Mark > > -- > Mark Richardson MBCS > Research Assistant > University of Teesside, UK > Email: [email protected] > [email protected] > Skype: mark.richardson. > > > _________________________________________________________________________________ > mozart-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.mozart-oz.org/mailman/listinfo/mozart-users >
_________________________________________________________________________________ mozart-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.mozart-oz.org/mailman/listinfo/mozart-users
