Well the current Sleepycat license is OSI Certified open source.
Is it really? I assumed it wasn't, because of the way he phrased his point about restricting commercial use.
If
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/sleepycat.php
is the license in question, then there doesn't seem to be a problem at first sight. We'd need to look at it more closely.
It seems the current version of dbm we use is under a 4-clause BSD license (with advertising clause). So moving might actually be advantageous. (Although we could probably delete the advertising clause now...)
Gerv _______________________________________________ mozilla-crypto mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-crypto
