Ian G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >If there is a patent, I'd say that kills the CRL DP >dead.
There is a patent, but like Netscape's patent on SSL it's purely a vanity patent. >I had a quick look on google and found that >there were other proposals that were "patent free" >but it certainly explains in part why CRLs haven't >taken off. I'd say CRLs are the reason why CRLs haven't taken off. Peter. _______________________________________________ mozilla-crypto mailing list [email protected] http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-crypto
