In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Gervase Markham"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ Following the newsgroup renaming... ;-) ]
>
> I think most people agree that www.mozilla.org is not as well-organised
> or informative as it could be.
>
> 1) Many pages are not W3C HTML compliant (and I think this includes the
> wrapper)
I've brought this up before, and it is apparently the result of apathy.
It seems the hypocrisy displayed by this situation (with respect to the
mozilla.org stance on Web browsers) is lost on some people.
It is unfortunate that key people don't care about this, but it is also
clear at this date that they aren't going to care. In light of that,
attempting to address this without putting some procedural controls in
place is likely just to be work that will be quickly eroded (and thus
pointless).
Would it be possible to automate validation of documents on checkin to
CVS (and rejection if they fail)?
Braden
