You know that moving over to using html4.01 and CSS you will loose some
presentation with nav4 but it will not make the site unreadable.
I am not saying use css-p. Look at my bug report where I offer some
examples. The only "rendering" that is losted is the borders around cells.
Mozilla should be an example for any web developer. Currently, I'd say that
the mozilla site's code is like what was generated in 1997-98 timeframe.
I do not understand why mozilla.org would continue to nest tables to get a
frame border around the table (that is sooo zeldman.com) when it can be as
simple as:
.box {
border: 3px solid #000;
}
<table class="box">
The benefit of getting nav4 to render that border by extra crappy markup
instead of CSS is lost when you consider the extra time it takes nav4 to
render the nested tables that are just for presentation.
The other CSS stuff that I think should be at least used is text colors,
fonts, background colors, and most important :link colors.
Why would mozilla.org site continue to put these in the <body> tag when nav4
has support for these basic CSS options? :-)
