On 20 Aug 2002, it is alleged that Minh Truong sauntered in to netscape.public.mozilla.documentation and loudly proclaimed:
> Frankly, I think the site layout for Mozilla is okay, but the > organization is terrible. It is hard for the end-user to navigate the > site. Many of the questions in the newsgroup are easily answered by the > 1.0 Start FAQ, but the Start FAQ isn't on > http://www.mozilla.org/faq.html and many more pages are deeply buried > in mozilla.org. Is something going to be done to remedy this? What's the > point of documenation when people can't find it. Hey, get into the boat with the rest of us, 'k? :-P Site organisation sucks, NG naming convention sucks, the Mozilla splash screen blows -- what else is new? ;-) The 1.0 FAQs were developed specifically for the 1.0 release. In recognition of the fact that Mozilla had been getting increasing media attention as things progressed to that release, it was decided (and Gerv got stuck with the s/Job/job/ of wrangling everyone) to deviate from the standard start page and give people a place from which to begin. . . . But see the thread Mitchell started yesterday for a bit of detail on what's going on. If you're a bit more brave, venture back for a couple months to get a better idea of just what has -- and hasn't -- happened in re. d11n. And I'm thinking it's time finally to start doing something with this ridiculous amount of material I've managed to collect over the past couple months so that maybe there /will/ be some useful/usable end-user d11n on m.o. What the hell, the worst that happens is Jayesh ends up hosting it on MozTips or some such. . . . /b. -- Mozilla end-user questions should be directed to: snews://secnews.netscape.com:563/netscape.mozilla.user.general snews://secnews.netscape.com:563/netscape.mozilla.user.win32 snews://secnews.netscape.com:563/netscape.mozilla.user.mac snews://secnews.netscape.com:563/netscape.mozilla.user.unix Note that you need to have SSL enabled and the port set to 563.
