In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, fantasai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> <link rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/"; > title="Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License 2.0"> It would be nice if the CC folks recommended that sort of thing over data in comments. > Approved licenses are the CC Attribution and Attribution Share-Alike 2.0 > Licenses. Is this policy going to be applied to new docs on www.mozilla.org as well? I'm just curious about the rationale behind the license choice. Why were CC-A and CC-SA licenses chosen over some other licenses that are designed for Free Software documentation? -- Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://iki.fi/hsivonen/ Mozilla Web Author FAQ: http://mozilla.org/docs/web-developer/faq.html _______________________________________________ mozilla-documentation mailing list mozilla-documentation@mozilla.org http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-documentation
