In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The FDL has various problems, as the Free Software Foundation's idea of > free-ness when it comes to documentation seems to be different to their > idea of free-ness for software. Do you mean Invariant Sections? > It also seems that Creative Commons has the most momentum in this area, > and so there is likely to be more compatible text. Seems reasonable. > Another consideration was that, to avoid licensing problems even within > the site, we wanted to keep the number of permitted licenses small. With > CC, we can do that, but still allow people to copyleft their text or not > as they choose. OK. -- Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://iki.fi/hsivonen/ Mozilla Web Author FAQ: http://mozilla.org/docs/web-developer/faq.html _______________________________________________ mozilla-documentation mailing list mozilla-documentation@mozilla.org http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-documentation
