If there are no xpt files to be found the the xpti system takes up *very* little space. What sort of embedding are you talking about? An xpcom embedding or a Gecko embedding? What sort of Gecko embedding is not going to have Javascript? Who cares?
John. Suresh Duddi wrote: > What about Manifest file ? That is loaded initially right. I was > thinking the embedded package shouldn't require use of any xpconnectish > features and hence may have this as an option. thoughts ? > > dp > > John Bandhauer wrote: > >> Suresh Duddi wrote: >> ... >> >>> - xpt loading should be done lazy. Might help embedded apps. >> >> >> >> xpt files *are* loaded lazily. It is just a question of how many >> primary xpt files are linked together into larger and less numerous >> xpt files at packaging time. Zipping them together rather than >> xpt_linking them together is a big win. At least one of our embedding >> clients is taking advantage of that win. This is just a packaging >> issue. The xpt loader is up to the task. >> >> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46707 >> >> John. >> > > >
