On 2005-10-27, Boris Zbarsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ben Hutchings wrote: >> The extents of the content of the link. > > You mean the smallest rectangle that contains all the layout objects > corresponding to descendants of the link DOM node in the DOM?
I suppose so, yes. > You can get that by getting the rectangles for all those nodes and taking the > minimal bounding rectangle... There's no one-stop place for this information. OK, I can manage that. > Note, however, that change of state on a link can also affect rendering of > the > link's siblings in the DOM, what with the CSS '+' and '~' combinators. I realise there are things like this that I won't catch, but I think I can live with documenting those as limitations. The idea is simply to let people use a familiar format and tools, not to support arbitrary existing web pages. For example, pages will have to fit on the screen rather than being scrollable, and if I'm not mistaken there will be a limit of 36 links per page. -- Ben Hutchings Never put off till tomorrow what you can avoid all together. _______________________________________________ mozilla-embedding mailing list mozilla-embedding@mozilla.org http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-embedding
