It still makes sense to describe Mozilla as a web browser, even if it isn't 100% accurate. "Web browser" is succinct and easy to understand, while "open-source internet application framework" is vague and effectively meaningless. The web browser component of Mozilla is the most significant piece to an end user. Bill Gervase Markham wrote: >> From the www.mozilla.org front page (emphasis mine): >> "Mozilla is an open-source *web browser*, designed for standards >> compliance, *performance* and portability." > > > Fair point. This needs changing. I'm surprised someone from Mail/News > hasn't complained before :-) > > Sadly, the top-level files are locked down, so we need someone like Endico > to fix this... > > http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63976 > > Gerv
- Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? Scott I. Remick
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? Daniel Veditz
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? Ross Evans
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? Gervase Markham
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than ... Ross Evans
- [OFF TOPIC] Re: Isn't Mozil... Asa Dotzler
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more ... David Murray
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than ... Henri Sivonen
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more ... Gervase Markham
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for m... Bill Lipa
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for m... Ross Evans
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for m... Henri Sivonen
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for m... Simon P. Lucy
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for m... Henri Sivonen
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for m... Asa Dotzler
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for m... Matthew Thomas
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for m... Gervase Markham
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for m... Bill Lipa
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for m... Gervase Markham
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for m... Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.