Matthew Thomas wrote:
>
> Oh yeah, baby!
>
> +------------------------------------------------------------+
> |::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::|
> +------------------------------------------------------------+
> | . The link you have selected points to the address |
> | /!\ "http:/fmf/wwwpages/fmf_models.html", which |
> | """ contravenes IETF RFC 2396 (AFAICT), C.E.T., CBE, |
> | section 5, clause 4 (hereinafter referred to as "the |
> | clause"). As punishment for clicking on a broken |
> | link, you have to deal with this alert. |
> | |
> | Which address do *you* think the author meant? |
> | (*) http://fmf/wwwpages/fmf_models.html |
> | ( ) http://vhdl.org/fmf/wwwpages/fmf_models.html |
> | ( ) How the #%!@ am I supposed to know? |
> | |
> | [ ] Remember this decision for invalid schemes in the |
> | future, even though the correct choice will be |
> | different on each occasion |
> | |
> | ( Uninstall Mozilla ) ( Cancel ) (( Continue )) |
> +------------------------------------------------------------+
Matthew, you have way too much time on your hands. :) (What are your
real thoughts on this, anyway?)
