[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Who said I can't run it? I said it's unusable. As in, both
> > Communicator 4.77 and IE/Outlook Express run circles around it
> > speed-wise, functionality-wise, every-wise.
>
> On the *75* MHz SPARC that I use Mozilla on:
Mozilla and what else? And what OS? And what Army? ;-)
> Mozilla consumes less RAM than
> IE;
So you're running NT then? How much less RAM? On my Why2K box here,
right now, let's check the numbers with the very latest nightly:
Mozilla blank page: 20MB
IE 6 blank page: 8MB
> renders as fast as IE and many TIMES faster than Netscape 4.77; the UI
> operates as fast as Netscape 4;
Friend, that must be one &%$@ed-up SPARC.
> and Mozilla actually renders webpages in an
> attractive manner with a readable font.
>
And neither IE or Nav 4.7x do?
> You said you don't have an axe to grind, but I have to commend you on the
> AMAZING impression you do of exactly that.
>
What axe do you think I'm grinding? I'll admit that the failure of the
Mozilla project has been a crushing disappointment to me, but does that
count as an axe?
> --
> Brandon Hume - hume -> BOFH.Halifax.NS.Ca, http://WWW.BOFH.Halifax.NS.Ca/
> -> Solaris Snob and general NOCMonkey
