JTK wrote:
>Unless I'm seeing things, I finally got this mother to build, and it
>runs.
>
>Couple comments:
>
>1. It appears to not build on the 9x series, only the NT series. That
>kinda sucks, especially since I don't have Why2K at home.
>
Well, no, I did it for about a year and am still able to. I didn't have
any trouble setting it up.
>
>2. The requirement of command.com/cmd.exe has got to go. Even on NT we
>all know it's a disaster, and is probably the reason behind #1.
>
Probably not, since #1 works for myself and others.
>
>3. Someone still needs to explain to me why the 'wintools' are needed
>when the equivalent (== much better) Cygwin ones are already there.
>4. Did I see a Win***16*** target in there?!?!? Lord.
>5. Someone also needs to explain to me why I can't do a simple 'cvs
>update'. I know there's lots of branches and whatnot - gcc has the same
>issues and yet doesn't have these cvs problems.
>
? What doesn't work? When I do a cvs update it works fine; it updates
only the branch I pulled...
--Blake
