>
> Whatever, I still maintain that LGPLing the whole works solves
> everybody's stated problems. But then we got that 2/3rds of the code
> that's NPLed, and no intention on AOLs part to change that or accept
> changes to it.
>
What's the problem? I must of missed it. I dont see it solve everyone's
problem, for one it dont solve the problem of allowing netscape to use
the code without been bound to the license for 2 years. If you add extra
clause to it, you'll almost end up with MPL anyway.
Can I ask what part of MPL don't you agree to?
>
> I don't know how that would be possible the way my script is set up (I'm
> working from locally checked-out files, not searching bugzilla or
> something). But I would expect they've touched nearly all of them.
>
Look for something along this line
"The Initial Developer of the Original Code is Netscape
* Communications Corporation"
its not complete, but a good estimate..
Another advantage of MPL is it allow mozilla to use code that are licensed
to netscape, such as the jpeg library.
Mike
