Richter wrote: > > Joe Camel wrote: > > > X-No-archive:yes > > > > I was just over in the Netscape 6 group and frankly, 6.2 still looks a > > little buggy for my tastes. I am now on 4.78, which other than no > > support of CSS, etc. and some instability basically works pretty > > nicely. Is it worth it to check out Netscape 6.2, or is it still > > betaware/bugware? Be honest, too, please. I am not an MS troll; I am > > just looking for some honest answers and do not want to hear shills. > > TIA! > > -- > > Never meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and good > > with ketchup. > > When you install NS 6.2 it does not interfere with your NS 4.7x at all. > It basically is another application/program/browser which runs side by > side. You can run either or both at the same time, I do. I am starting > to use NS 6.2 more and more. More so with each release. > BTW -- I run NS 4.75, NS 6.2 and Mozilla both at the same time with > no problems. Don't delete your NS 4.78 until you are very familiar and > confident with NS 6.2 -- I haven't and won't for quite a while yet -- and > then there are those old web sites with NS 4.7x proprietory codes to > consider. > Get NS 6.2 and take it out for a test drive. > > Gus
I assume you are using either a Windows or 'NIX machine? As I've been chided here often. Don't make broad brush assumptions. while on 'nix and windows you can do this Netscape 6 and Communicator up to 4.7.8 do conflict with each other. -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling 616 Liberty Street |Who's Who. PHONE:276-632-5045, FAX:275-632-0868 Martinsville Va 24112-1809 |[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet --------------------------------------------------------------------------- If it's "fixed", don't "break it"! mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/default.htm http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/america/default.htm http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/message/default.htm
