In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jonathan Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What in particular makes 4.x better than 6 for the users? I encourage Netscape 4.x users to look for alternatives. However, here are some reasons why (I think) some people are still sticking to nav 4.x: * Linux distribution came with Nav 4.x. Too lazy to upgrade. * Mac OS came with IE and Nav 4.x. Won't use anything from MS. Won't download alternatives. * Doesn't like the XUL-based UI. * Netscape 6 takes more RAM. * Netscape 6 wants a faster CPU. * Netscape 6 starts up slowly on Mac OS 8.5...9.2.1 * Special feature need. Eg. roaming. * Trapped with Messenger: Doesn't want to risk migrating mail to a new app. * Using a *really* exotic variant of Unix with no Mozilla port available. * Using a less exotic flavor of Unix with a Mozilla port available but no Netscape 6.2 port. Too scared to use Mozilla without the Netscape logo. * FUD still flying around due to Netscape 6.0. * Problem with a plug-in. * Thinks that using Nav 4.x is a statement against Microsoft and wants to make a statement against MS but irrationally doesn't follow the same logic with any other non-MS browser--including Netscape 6.2. -- Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clinet.fi/~henris/
