If Mozilla.org acknowledges this as a problem and removes it to placate the far-right hard-liner political views of a few reactionary nuts, then I will undo everything I've ever contributed to the project.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ian Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yatsu wrote: > > > On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 17:40:16 +0100, Jason Bassford wrote: > > > > > > I'm not sure what happend to the old icons, but no doubt there's a bug > > filed on this. All you need is two developers willing to review and one > > of them to check it in. This could take about, 10 minutes? > > > > There's likely to be some other reason why no mozilla developers seem > > willing to change the icons. Otherwise it'd have been done years ago. > > > > BTW, why not use mozilla.org's favicon? Seems like a rather obvious > > solution *if* the lack of a good icon is the problem. > > > > - yatsu > > > No, it needs one of the mozilla.org drivers to realise that this is a > genuine problem and not just a little thing that a couple of users winge > about. Then, they will get a set of new, non-trademarked and inoffensive > images (the red dinosaur fits this description AFAIK). > > IMO it should be one of the mozilla1.0 criteria to remove _all_ > non-red-dinosaur images from Mozilla. > > Ian > > > >
