DeMoN LaG wrote: > > JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], > on 31 Jan 2002: > > > It is indeed a cool script. Too bad the guy had to rewrite it (and > > the switch page guys will have to get the new one) just so Mozilla > > could understand it. But hey, when you've got 0.75% market share, > > I guess it's your duty to throw all that weight around, huh? > > Pfhht. > > > > Yeah, I know. Imagine, forcing someone to follow the WRITTEN > SPECIFICATIONS for a technology.
Further imagine trying to force said someone when you have LESS THAN ONE PERCENT MARKET SHARE. > I think I should be able to write: > <Jim's tag> <make some content here> <and make it look pretty> and have > the browser automatically think of some cool content and format it > however would look nicest. Cause I mean, why shouldn't all the browsers > support my idea of HTML tags right? > Did that work in Communicator? Does it work in IE? If so, then Mozilla damn well better support it!
