Ben Tremblay wrote: > > JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > DeMoN LaG wrote: > > > JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:3C5DB7AD.6578A3D7 > > > @hgdjaggd.com, on 03 Feb 2002: > > > > the cache bug, > > > Sorry, I don't recall you "fixing" this one, just bitching for a week > > > when a 30 second "Edit, Preferences, Advanced, Cache, Clear disk cache" > > > would have fixed it for you. Do you have a bug number, or a copy of the > > > patch you "made" that fixed this bug? > > Fished in LaGgy. As I already posted, that's not me, but somebody so > > empty inside that they want, need, to pretend they're me. > I was going to call you a pathetic pain in the ass ...
But of course you thought better of it. > I've been > reading the NG for 30 minutes or so and I' totally sick of you ... It was not meant that all should hear. > but > it just dawned on me: you think you're contributing by playing devil's > advocate! That would require a "devil" to advocate, would it not? > OMG, that's so sad! Well I'll agree with you there; this project is simply too far gone for even me to resurrect, and it's sad, almost sick in a way, that I even bother trying. But this St. Jude medal weighs heavy upon my breast. > You think straining at gnats is evidence of your > ability? Serving up week-old CNN is a "gnat"? > You poor dear thing! You know, there's the _chance_ that you > aren't iredeemably compulsive ... Nope, none. I'm as compulsive as they get when it comes to software that's actually usable. > I mean, vanishing slight that it > might be, there's a chance that the dumb-assed persistence you share > with so many coders might be turned to good use. > > Is there a chance that you can concentrate on something for as long as > ummmm 15 or 20 minutes? What was that again? Sorry, I wasn't concentrating. > Gawd knows XCOPMPTR is as close to rocket > science as I've seen lately, but there's more to the project than CPP > ... and a damned site more than just pissing over everything 24/7 > I don't follow... you're suggesting that *urine* would cure what ails Mozilla? Well I don't know, guess we've tried everything else....
