JTK wrote: >>Wordstar used to fly on old hardware too. Win 3.11 ran very well in a >>486 environment with 4megs yet Win 95 replaced it despite the fact it >>required a Pentium class CPU and at least 16 megs of RAM. >> > >Win95 was a hell of a lot better than Win3.11. Mozilla is a hell of a >lot *worse* than NC4.7x and IE. > Trolling again? There's no way its worse than NC4.7, and it's nicer than any version of IE I've ever used. You might find a few specific areas where one of those two are better, but overall Mozilla is vastly superior to Netscape 4 and better than IE in just about every area except DOM performance.
So what in your opinion makes IE so wonderful? So wonderful in fact that you spend a huge amount of your time in the Mozilla groups. If it was really so excellent you wouldn't be remotely interested in Mozilla as you'd have no need for any other browser. I'm beginning to think that your relationship with Mozilla is similar to that between those married couples who do nothing but argue and nit pick each other, but love every minute of it. Except in this case the relationship is one way... you're the Log Lady and Mozilla is the log. ian.
