Jonas Jørgensen wrote: > David Tenser wrote: > > Blake Ross wrote: > >>> Does this mean that they haven't had the time to add this feature in > >>> four years? > >> > >> No, it means that few of Mozilla's distributor's customers have been > >> clamoring for it, and thus it's not a priority. Why would a feature > >> be added because a bug filer wanted it? Do you think that's how > >> things work in other software projects? > > > >> In other words, the only way to get a feature implemented is to keep >> on posting it as a bug, which will lead to more overhead work for the >> poor guys who have to wade through the duplicates every day. > > > I think what he means is that it's up to each Mozilla contributor to > decide what they want to work on. The people who are payed by Netscape > to work on Mozilla works on whatever Netscape feels is important. > Netscape, apparently, does not feel that this feature is high priority, > so the Netscape people work on something else instead. If you want this > feature now, you'll have to write it yourself. Sorry, but that's just > the way things work. >
I guess. I'm a VB coder, so it would probably take more time for me to get familiar with the code than it would take for Netscape to implement this themselves :( Man kan inte få allt... / David
