seeing, I don't really understand the comments, but maybe you can get more out of it...
Eric wrote: > also, i just found out that the version that was on the server yesterday > was a different version than before. I played a bit with bg images to > see if it makes any difference. > > Now CSS validator tells me > 1) This document validates as CSS! > > 2) and the HTML validator gives me hree unrelated errors of which i'm > aware: > <form> > Error: required attribute "ACTION" not specified > <link rel="shortcut icon" href="http://ngd.kvi.nl/favicon.ico"> > Error: element "LINK" not allowed here; check which elements this > border=0 alt="Nedstat counter" nosave width=16 height=16></a> > Error: "NOSAVE" is not a member of a group specified for any attribute > > but still the page doesn't show the layer with negative z-index. > I'm still trying to find out if i'm too blond or if mozilla doesn't > render the page as it should. > Eric > > > Travis Crump wrote: > >> Even though the style is in the html part it is still considered css, >> you have to click on the link to validate css to see the error. >> >> Eric wrote: >> >>> strange, i used validator.w3.org >>> and all that gave me was >>> >>> -- >>> <form> Error: required attribute "ACTION" not specified >>> <link rel="shortcut icon" href="http://ngd.kvi.nl/favicon.ico"> >>> Error: element "LINK" not allowed here; check which elements >>> <meta name="MSSmartTagsPreventParsing" content="TRUE"> >>> <META HTTP-EQUIV="MSThemeCompatible" Content="Yes"> >>> border=0 alt="Nedstat counter" nosave width=16 height=16></a> >>> -- >>> >>> and these are all by design. It gives me no warning about the divs. >>> That's why i started wondering if maybe Mozilla maybe doesn't handle >>> negative z-indexes properly. >>> >>> Christian, you say you think it's a Moz bug? Do you happen to have a >>> bug number at hand? >>> Thanks >>> >>> Eric >>> >>> >>> >> >