TenThumbs wrote:
> Darin Fisher wrote:
>
>> So, following the guidelines of section 15.1.4, you are suggesting that
>> the UA-string not include a language identifier unless the user
>> explicitly permits it?
>
Yes.
> If you start adding options to control peices of the UA string, where do you
> stop?
Who uses the lang section of the UA string anyway, considering that we
have Accept-Language? We have control UI for the latter since what do I
know which version.
> I would jsut put the whole thing in the UI and let people shoot themselves in the
>foot
lol. I know for sure that Judson would object :). I had a hard time to
convince him to review a *hidden* pref for that.
> but I'm weird.
No comment :).
