Re: Protozilla in Mozilla? (proposal)

[Mike Shaver]

Doug Turner wrote:

> Sure.  But unlike other "optional" protocols (gopher, datetime, finger, ftp), this 
>generic module
> really requires a UI.    That is why I proposed extensions.

(Glad to see we're going to get this in!)

Don't a lot of our protocols require UI for password prompting, proxy 
settings and the like?

What sort of UI does protozilla require, and how does it meaningfully 
differ from the other protocols' UI requirements?  (I confess to never 
having used Protozilla.  Bad me.)

Mike