Mike Shaver wrote:
> Doug Turner wrote:
>
> > Sure. But unlike other "optional" protocols (gopher, datetime, finger, ftp), this
>generic module
> > really requires a UI. That is why I proposed extensions.
>
> (Glad to see we're going to get this in!)
>
> Don't a lot of our protocols require UI for password prompting, proxy
> settings and the like?
>
> What sort of UI does protozilla require, and how does it meaningfully
> differ from the other protocols' UI requirements? (I confess to never
> having used Protozilla. Bad me.)
>
> Mike
Core protocols require very little use to be useful. Protozilla requires UI to just
to be useful.
http://protozilla.mozdev.org/screenshots.html
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
