> Uh, are you sure that text/xhtml+xml is a real mime type? Somebody
> requested application/xhtml+xml (implemented) but this is the first time
> I have heard of text/xhtml+xml...
Nope, not sure at all. Google doesn't seem to provide very many hits, so
I'm probably dreaming :-)
Current candidate:
Accept: text/xml, application/xml, application/xhtml+xml,
text/html;q=0.9, image/png, image/mng, image/jpeg,
image/gif;q=0.1, text/plain;q=0.8, text/css, */*;q=0.01
(the image/gif change to q=0.1 is to show what we think of GIFs ;-)
What's the current situation with Javascript MIME types? As far as I can
see, this is the final thing we might need to include.
Gerv
