Matthew Tuck wrote:
> Brendan Eich wrote:
>
> > What happened to the idea of tailoring Accept based on the requesting tag?
>
> Sounds reasonable, but we should get the correct solution in before
> implementing a performance enhancement I think.
Why? What's correct about a bloated, inapt list of MIME types when fetching an
image?
Worse is better, yeah -- except that argument degenerates to */*. Let's at
least scope out the work, so we don't run into some "hard" problem optimizing
later, and decide to "Future" the optimization.
> Is there a bug on this idea?
Dunno -- Gerv?
/be
