Gervase Markham wrote:
> Niko Pavlicek wrote:
>>another point are the votes for bugs. IMO all the often voted bugs
>>should be fixed, say all bugs with >= 5 votes, which is currently a list
>>of 309 bugs (of which some are tracking bugs):
>>
>
> I don't agree. Some much-voted-for bugs are feature work that no-one has
> volunteered to do before Mozilla 1.0. Holding up the declaration for those
> would be silly. Also, what the public wants and what the public gets are
> often two very different things, for a variety of reasons. ;-)
There's also the potential for an ever-expanding list. As soon as one
gets fixed, people would move their votes to other bugs, making bugs >=5
votes a retreating target. However, reviewing the list of top
vote-getters for relatively high reward/low risk items would be a good idea.
--
http://www.classic-games.com/ http://www.indie-games.com/
I've often thought intelligence agencies should recruit idiots, as
idiots seem able to infiltrate any group in large numbers.
