[Followups and replies redirected to .seamonkey _only_] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Syd Logan) writes: > Actually, if we can get people behind doxygen, or some other technology, then > that'd be great, but I would say that any comments that had the needed > information would be just fine, regardless of the form. > Doxygen is already the chosen standard for mozilla projects, and has been for quite some time. Many IDL files already have good doxygen commentary. See <http://unstable.elemental.com/mozilla/> (already linked to from lxr) for lots of doxygen generated documentation, class hierarchies, etc. Dan --
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Ben Bucksch
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Gervase Markham
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 H�kan Waara
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Ben Bucksch
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Syd Logan
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 illion
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Chris Seawood
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Gervase Markham
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 pete collins
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 David Baron
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Dan Mosedale
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Gervase Markham
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Chris Seawood
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Greg Miller
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Greg Miller
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 illion
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Ben Bucksch
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Sebastian Sp�th
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 chris hofmann
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Ben Bucksch
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Chris Hofmann
