in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gervase Markham at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01-06-24 18.33: > Footprint, Performance and Stability > ------------------------------------ > I want to start by making a controversial statement: we should have no, or > very little criteria in these categories for Mozilla 1.0. > This is always the question, but as a non tekkie, i would say that performance is VERY important. As an example i can accept if a web-site missplaces a picture in mozilla. But if it is slow in doing it, theres no reason to use it. See Opera, they are lightning fast but cant display websites. They still get many users just out of the pure admiration of their speed. This however is just my thoughts. -- illion * Mac & Pc wheenie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Petr Krenzelok
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Christopher Blizzard
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Gervase Markham
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Alan S. Jones
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Gervase Markham
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Ben Bucksch
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Gervase Markham
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 H�kan Waara
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Ben Bucksch
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Syd Logan
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 illion
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Chris Seawood
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Gervase Markham
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 pete collins
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 David Baron
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Dan Mosedale
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Gervase Markham
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Chris Seawood
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Greg Miller
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 Greg Miller
- Re: Towards Mozilla 1.0 illion
