Jason Fleshman wrote: > Actually, I think that right now it's more like 7%/91%/4%. At least, > that's what the monthly stats package I receive says, but you can take > it with as big a grain of salt as you want. > > Anyway, assuming 40% of IE's users switch as a result of AOL, that would > become something like 43%/53%/4% -- not quite as even as the original > estimate, but still pretty good. ...And if I could do math, I'd've written 7%/89%/4%. But the second set of numbers is still OK. --Jason
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Mszlazak
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion RV
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Mszlazak
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion RV
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Scott I. Remick
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Greg Miller
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion DeMoN_LaG
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Jason Fleshman
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Jason Fleshman
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Asa Dotzler
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Asa Dotzler
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Henri Sivonen
