Re: Mozilla 1.0 Manifesto

[Steve Elmer]

We held one such meeting and the toplevel roadmaps look congruent.  That was done prior to actual scheduling knowledge being available and we might have a tough problem of either cutting things we want or moving the dates out.  I don't know the answer for Mach V just yet (the original roadmap was a strawman, not a commitment.)

The main criteria is that we would rather be exactly in sync than off by exactly one milestone.  If we're off by two or more milestones we can probably coexist reasonably well.

Steve

Judson Valeski wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]"> Well written (though "manifesto" leaves me wondering :-); well, I guess I stopped wondering awhile ago ;-)). I nominating the party bug for mozilla1.0 :-).

Have you spoken w/ NS folks about allignment w/ MachV? There might be allignment here w/ the first release of AOL/Gecko.

Jud

Brendan Eich wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]">

I've posted a document about Mozilla 1.0.  Please comment here (note reply-to and followup-to headers above) or by emailing me.  The roadmap's 
new milestone table has been updated to match.

http://www.mozilla.org/roadmap/mozilla-1.0.html

/be
--------------