Stuart Ballard wrote: >I don't know whether this will affect your views, but did you notice >that under this policy, the "small, hand-picked group of people" would >almost certainly include yourself? > Yes, I am aware of that. Actually, Mitch said something like that I "would certainly be part of such a group" in an earlier post. All I wrote here is written under the assumption that I will be part of the (larger) security group.
I am very glad about that, as I really need that info, but that's also why I see it as something like "stating the necessarity". But the proposal doesn't even allow me do to everything I need to do for Beonex. Much less does the proposal do what I think is the right thing in general.
