On Wednesday 25 May 2005 19:14, Anne & Lynn Wheeler wrote: > Nelson B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Ah, I was wondering when paradoxes would enter this discussion. > > CA self revocation: Everything I say is a lie. > > > > "I think not" said Descartes, who promptly vanished. > > the original scenario was that CA could only assert that they were no > longer valid
[fairly standard protocol stuff snipped] Sure, that's obvious. But, Lynn, can you shed any light on why the standards didn't include a mechanism? You seem to be intimating that the original PKI concept included it. iang -- Advances in Financial Cryptography: https://www.financialcryptography.com/mt/archives/000458.html _______________________________________________ Mozilla-security mailing list [email protected] http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-security
