Doug Ludy wrote:
I am a newcomer who knows a little bit about group process. It has been
fascinating to watch this newsgroup at work--brilliant minds and
powerful egos working toward similar goals. I am reminded of a debate
in the English parliament. Rather than viewing the current impasse in
terms of betrayal and trickery I think a more charitable approach might
be the model of "culture clash". How does a group accustomed to open
process communicate and negotiate with another group whose approach is
proprietary and secretive? What rules apply? Which compromises are
life-enhancing rather that life-threatening? This is a very old
dilemma. I sincerely hope this discussion continues, for trust is
important to me.
Interesting comment. But: the discussion was between two groups which
are both claiming to follow and believe in open process; I believe Gerv
in his note clearly indicates his personal preference for more open
process. Anyway, considering Mozilla are currently pursueing a
different, `closed` approach, the technical discussion moved to the new
list Duane made (see original post).
Best, Amir Herzberg
_______________________________________________
Mozilla-security mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-security
