|
I think the idea was more along the lines of having
the Mozilla organization host xpcom.org. It's a marketing/presentation change,
not a change of ownership. Right now XPCOM is buried inside the Mozilla browser
project and very few people are aware that it can be used as a standalone
tool. By giving XPCOM it's own identity it would have more of a chance to
grow as a standalone platform. Something like
xpcom.mozzila.org could work.
Another issue: why is there a browser build of
XPCOM and a standalone build of XPCOM? Couldn't there be just a single
XPCOM? NSPR has a single version. There are only six XPCOM C
files using XPCOM_STANDALONE. The differences look to be fairly
small.
Has anyone from the NSPR group talked to the Apache
APR group? Is there any hope of avoiding two portable runtime efforts? Apache
has split APR off into a standalone project for 2.0.
|
- Re: XPCOM.org? jesus X
- Re: XPCOM.org? Rick Parrish
- Re: XPCOM.org? Daniel Veditz
- Re: XPCOM.org? Pierre Phaneuf
- Re: XPCOM.org? Gervase Markham
- Re: XPCOM.org? Rick Parrish
- Re: XPCOM.org? Chris Waterson
- Re: XPCOM.org? Pierre Phaneuf
- Re: XPCOM.org? Brendan Eich
- Re: XPCOM.org? Brendan Eich
- Re: XPCOM.org? Jon Smirl
- Re: XPCOM.org? Pierre Phaneuf
- Re: XPCOM.org? Rick Parrish
- Re: XPCOM.org? Pierre Phaneuf
- Re: XPCOM.org? Pierre Phaneuf
- Re: XPCOM.org? Pierre Phaneuf
- Re: XPCOM.org? Ari Heitner
- Re: XPCOM.org? Brendan Eich
- Re: XPCOM.org? Simon P. Lucy
- Re: XPCOM.org? Brendan Eich
- Re: XPCOM.org? Ari Heitner
