Pierre Phaneuf wrote: > I agree. I thought about it very hard before starting that project (for > nearly two years in fact, during which I contributed to XPCOM when I > could manage to), but the "few other more technical points to fix" could > be pretty radical to some people. For a summary of XPLC specifics and discussions about it, take a look here: http://advogato.org/article/222.html -- "Unix was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things." -- Doug Gwyn
- Re: XPCOM.org? Gervase Markham
- Re: XPCOM.org? Rick Parrish
- Re: XPCOM.org? Chris Waterson
- Re: XPCOM.org? Pierre Phaneuf
- Re: XPCOM.org? Brendan Eich
- Re: XPCOM.org? Brendan Eich
- Re: XPCOM.org? Jon Smirl
- Re: XPCOM.org? Pierre Phaneuf
- Re: XPCOM.org? Rick Parrish
- Re: XPCOM.org? Pierre Phaneuf
- Re: XPCOM.org? Pierre Phaneuf
- Re: XPCOM.org? Pierre Phaneuf
- Re: XPCOM.org? Ari Heitner
- Re: XPCOM.org? Brendan Eich
- Re: XPCOM.org? Simon P. Lucy
- Re: XPCOM.org? Brendan Eich
- Re: XPCOM.org? Ari Heitner
- Re: XPCOM.org? Ari Heitner
- Re: XPCOM.org? Brendan Eich
- Re: XPCOM.org? Pierre Phaneuf
- Re: XPCOM.org? Wan-Teh Chang
