Mark Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Another problem with AAC is that FhG claims on their web site that you
>have to pay them money even if you just give away free players!
>Without a lot of free players out there, I dont see how the format is
>ever going to catch on.  Yes the quality is better, but in a few years 
>we'll have the bandwidth and storage we can just switch to 256kbs mp3s?

I hear that Layer II at 256 kbps is better ( higher quality )
than Layer III at 256 kbps. Any comments on that ?

There are some HQ Layer II samples on phillips site.
( can remember the URL right now, will look up 
upon request )

--
David Balazic , student
E-mail   : [EMAIL PROTECTED]     |     living in  sLOVEnija
home page: http://surf.to/stein
Computer: Amiga 1200 + Quantum LPS-340AT
--
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list

Reply via email to